Has anyone noticed that the 650FLB adapter really doesn't have very good VMQ support compared to older adapters? In my ITDev Lab, my older BL460C Gen8 blades using 554FLB NICs have plenty of queues - 29 per NIC (please forgive the formatting):
PS C:\Windows\system32> get-netadaptervmq
Name InterfaceDescription Enabled BaseVmqProcessor MaxProcessors NumberOfReceive
Queues
---- -------------------- ------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------
Migration_NIC1 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#13 False 0:0 29
Cluster_NIC1 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#16 False 0:0 29
Storage2_NIC1 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#15 False 0:0 29
Storage1_NIC1 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#14 False 0:0 29
VMNetworks_NIC2 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#12 True 0:0 29
VMNetworks_NIC1 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#11 True 0:0 29
MGMT_NIC2 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 55...#9 True 0:0 29
MGMT_NIC1 HP FlexFabric 10Gb 2-port 5...#10 True 0:0 29
VMNetworks_Team Microsoft Network Adapter Mult... True 0:0 58
MGMT_Team Microsoft Network Adapter Mu...#2 True 0:0 58
But the newer 650's have very little - 9 per NIC - not enough to support 75-100 VDI's:
PS C:\Windows\system32> get-netadaptervmq
Name InterfaceDescription Enabled BaseVmqProcessor MaxProcessors NumberOfReceive
Queues
---- -------------------- ------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------
Storage 2 HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 65...#6 False 0:22 8 9
Storage 1 HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 65...#5 False 0:2 8 9
Migration 2 HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 65...#4 False 1:18 1 9
Migration 1 HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 65...#3 False 0:18 1 9
Management 2 HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 65...#2 True 0:0 4 9
Management 1 HP FlexFabric 20Gb 2-port 650F... True 0:0 4 9
LogicalSwitch01 Microsoft Network Adapter Mult... True 0:0 18
So I want to use these as Hyper-V hosts for VDI (XenDesktop), and hope to get 60 or 70 VMs per host. But with these 650FLB adapters, when I use our typical template of 2 NICs for VM traffic, I won't have nearlhy enough VMQs.
Am I missing something here? Shouldn't newer hardware have more, or at least the same? The only workaround I can think of is adding every NIC to a single virtual switch and having the storage, migration, and bandwidth, carved out using port profiles in the virtual switch.
Am I missing something? Did we order the wrong adapter? I'm using the latest firmware (10.7.110.34) and driver (10.7.110.16) I can find. We ordered a hundred blades or so - I'd hate to be stuck with this as it is.
Thanks,
Bruce